SEC Persecution Report

SEC REGULATORY PERSECUTION REPORT Summary of Wrongful Actions Against Frank Ojogwa Ekejija and NVC Fund --- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) conducted a systematic, discriminatory, and ultimately failed persecution campaign against Frank Ojogwa Ekejija and NVC Fund Holding Trust from 2018-2022. After 2+ years of intensive investigation, federal court proceedings conclusively proved the SEC's case was baseless, discriminatory, and constitutionally invalid. Key Finding: The SEC failed to identify a single injured party or demonstrate any actual damages despite 2+ years of investigation, while federal courts validated $48.8 trillion in legitimate assets under oath. --- TIMELINE OF SEC PERSECUTION December 28, 2017: LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTRODUCTION CRITICAL EVIDENCE: Transparent Business Arrangement - Elder Stant James, CEO of Saint James Investment Holdings Trust Company, introduces NVC/Frank to three OTC companies - Elder Stant James serves as management company helping organize and manage books and records of NVC Fund Holding Trust - Introduction follows recent financial statement audit review by Standard and Partners organized by Elder Stant James - Intent was clearly transparent and above board for the benefit of public shareholders Documentation Timeline Proves Transparency (December 2017 - February 2018) - December 31, 2017: Letters of Intent executed with multiple companies (PDXP, VICT) - January 9, 2018: Securities Purchase Agreement with CHIT for $250M in preferred stock - February 26, 2018: Professional escrow agreement with Transfer Online Inc. - February 15, 2018: SEC suspends CHIT trading (companies were already experiencing issues) - All documentation shows NVC Fund as INVESTOR providing assets, not operator Phase 1: Initial Harassment (2018-2020) - Baseless Investigation: SEC launched investigations without identifying any injured parties - Asset Denial: SEC attacked $48.8 trillion in certified assets as "dubious" despite professional auditor validation - Intimidation Tactics: Coordinated harassment campaign designed to damage reputation Phase 2: Wells Notice Intimidation (July 9, 2020) - Threatening Wells Notice: SEC officials Manuel Vazquez and Roberto Tercero issued intimidating enforcement threats - False Allegations: Claimed violations of Securities Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Section 10(b) without evidence - 14-Day Ultimatum: Unreasonable deadline designed to prevent adequate defense preparation - No Concrete Evidence: After 2+ years of investigation, SEC still provided no substantial proof Phase 3: Federal Court Litigation (September 30, 2020) - Full Federal Lawsuit: Case No. 2:20-cv-08985 filed in Central District of California - Baseless "Pump and Dump" Claims: SEC alleged fraudulent scheme involving Cherubim Interests, PDX Partners, and Victura Construction Group - NVC Fund Asset Attack: SEC systematically attacked $48.8 trillion NVC Fund assets despite certified financial statements - Coordinated Conspiracy: SEC claimed Frank Ekejija participated in fraudulent public statements without evidence --- ADDRESSING THE CREDIBILITY QUESTION: WHY NO LEGAL DEFENSE? The Most Asked Question: "Why Didn't Frank Hire Legal Counsel?" This is the critical credibility question that reasonable minds ask: If Frank Ekejija had access to $56.7 trillion in assets, why didn't he hire top legal counsel to defend against the SEC? The Strategic and Practical Reasons: 1. CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH OVER TRADITIONAL DEFENSE - The case was fundamentally constitutional, not securities law: With zero injured parties and no damages, this was regulatory overreach requiring constitutional challenge, not traditional securities defense - Traditional securities lawyers focus on settlements and plea bargains - inappropriate when no actual wrongdoing occurred - Constitutional law requires different expertise than securities defense attorneys 2. JUDGE WRIGHT'S INITIAL RULING VALIDATED THE STRATEGY - August 2021: Judge Wright DENIED SEC penalties as "not adequately supported" - proving the case was indeed baseless - No legal counsel was needed when competent judge correctly identified SEC overreach - The strategy worked until SEC engaged in judge shopping - no lawyer could have prevented procedural manipulation 3. ASSET SCALE MADE TRADITIONAL DEFENSE IRRELEVANT - $56.7T in court-validated assets made monetary penalties meaningless - like a billionaire fighting a parking ticket - Focus was on precedent and constitutional principles, not avoiding financial consequences - Resources better spent on documentation and asset protection than fighting baseless regulatory harassment 4. SEC'S ADMISSION OF NO DAMAGES MADE DEFENSE UNNECESSARY - SEC officially admitted "no claim nor allegations regarding damages" - what is there to defend against? - No injured parties identified after 2+ years of investigation - traditional defense assumes actual wrongdoing occurred - Federal court validated $48.8T in assets under oath - financial legitimacy already established 5. SYSTEMATIC PERSECUTION REQUIRED DIFFERENT APPROACH - Traditional legal defense assumes good faith regulatory action - inappropriate when facing systematic discrimination - Constitutional challenge and federal court asset validation more effective than conventional securities defense - Documentation strategy proved prescient - now provides complete record of SEC procedural manipulation The Proof This Strategy Was Correct: - ✓ Judge Wright denied SEC penalties (traditional defense would have sought settlement) - ✓ Assets validated under federal court scrutiny (worth more than any legal victory) - ✓ SEC's judge shopping exposed (traditional defense wouldn't have revealed this corruption) - ✓ Complete documentation of persecution (provides foundation for future constitutional challenges) Why Document Evidence After the Fact? This isn't "complaining after losing" - this is building the constitutional case that matters: - Judge Wright's correct denial proves the merits - SEC had to manipulate the system to win - Constitutional violations don't disappear because of procedural manipulation - documentation preserves the record - Future regulatory reform requires complete evidence of how the system was corrupted - Asset validation under oath remains legally binding regardless of penalty manipulation --- THE STRATEGIC VICTORY: SEC INADVERTENTLY VALIDATED EVERYTHING The Profound Irony *"Regardless of the pain caused by the SEC exercise, I am grateful for the journey because it would have been impossible to convince anyone about the size of NVC Fund Holding without the forensic investigation. The SEC knew the facts, but they just did not want the truth to be true so they strategized to bury it, and destroy me along with it."* - Frank Ojogwa Ekejija What the SEC Investigation Actually Accomplished: FORENSIC VALIDATION OF $56.7T ASSETS - SEC's 2+ year investigation confirmed asset legitimacy under federal court scrutiny - Impossible to achieve this validation without SEC's extensive forensic examination - No private auditor could provide the credibility of federal investigation validation FEDERAL COURT ASSET AUTHENTICATION - $48.8T validated under oath in federal proceedings - Professional auditors testified to asset authenticity under penalty of perjury - SEC failed to rebut asset validation despite unlimited resources CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED - Judge Wright's denial proves case was baseless - competent judicial review validated Frank's position - SEC judge shopping exposed - creates precedent for challenging regulatory manipulation - Complete documentation of constitutional violations preserved for future reform The SEC's Strategic Dilemma: - They knew the facts were true - $56.7T assets are legitimate - They didn't want the truth to be true - threatens regulatory narrative - They strategized to bury it - attempted to destroy Frank rather than acknowledge reality - They inadvertently validated everything - forensic investigation proved what Frank claimed ULTIMATE VICTORY: SEC's investigation provided the credibility and validation that transformed NVC Fund from "unbelievable claims" to "federally validated assets." --- SPECIAL RECOGNITION: MARK IRVINE RITCHIE - CONSTITUTIONAL ARCHITECT Attorney General for Frank O. Ekejija Estate Trust and NVC Fund Holding Trust Special recognition goes to Mark Irvine Ritchie, who served as the Attorney General for the Frank O. Ekejija Estate Trust and NVC Fund Holding Trust. Though not a member of the bar association, he was instrumental in the sustained constitutional defeat of the SEC. Mark Irvine Ritchie's Strategic Constitutional Approach: - Constitutional Authority: Represented Frank through estate trust authority rather than traditional bar membership - Sacred Federal Standing: Established constitutional standing through Declaration of Sacred Federal Standing - Strategic Victory Architect: Instrumental in achieving Judge Wright's denial of SEC penalties - Constitutional Framework: Built the legal foundation that exposed SEC's procedural manipulation - Precedent Establishment: Helped create constitutional precedent for challenging regulatory overreach Mark Irvine Ritchie's work demonstrates that constitutional authority and strategic legal thinking can defeat regulatory persecution even outside traditional bar association structures. His approach was vindicated by Judge Wright's denial and the subsequent exposure of SEC judge shopping. --- THE COERCION ATTEMPT: SEC DEMANDED SURRENDER Frank's Own Words Expose SEC Tactics: *"The SEC practically wanted me to surrender and agree that I violated their rule 10(b)5 when they they know that I did not. Because I stood firm and rejected their cursion, the asked the Judge to fine me the maximum penalty to prevent me from violating the rule that I never violated in the first place in the future."* The SEC's Coercion Strategy: - Demanded false confession to Rule 10b-5 violations - Frank knew he was innocent and refused to surrender - SEC retaliated with maximum penalties as intimidation - Punishment for "future violations" of non-existent crimes Frank's Principled Response (September 12, 2022): *"I reject and refuse your offer... You carried out a 30-month-long SEC forensic investigation of the NVC Fund and discovered that we were not engaged in any pump and dump scheme. You could have stopped and ended your actions because you knew that we were not involved in such a scheme as you had suspected. Nevertheless, you decided to entangle NVC Fund and me in the Federal Court civil case even when you knew that you had no claim upon which a penalty relief could be paid."* SMOKING GUN: SEC's own investigation proved Frank's innocence, but they proceeded anyway to destroy his reputation. The Manufacturing of "Evidence": After Judge Wright's denial, Manuel Vazquez and colleagues had to create "pathetic declarations to justify the unjustifiable" through a back room rubber stamping arrangement to manufacture the justification Wright had properly denied for lack of evidence. --- SEC'S FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL FAILURES 1. NO INJURED PARTY IDENTIFIED - VIOLATES SEC'S OWN LEGAL STANDARDS Critical Constitutional and Legal Failure: - After 2+ years of intensive federal investigation, SEC failed to identify a single injured party - SEC officially admitted in court documents: "no claim nor allegations regarding damages" - This violates fundamental legal standing requirements under Article III of the Constitution - SEC violated their own Rule 10b-5 standards which require proof of economic loss and loss causation - Georgetown Law Review confirms: "individuals must show actual harm resulted from deceit in the securities context in order to recover" 2. NO ACTUAL DAMAGES PROVEN Zero Financial Harm Established: - Despite extensive investigation, SEC proved zero financial damages to any party - No investors, institutions, or individuals demonstrated any losses - SEC's own admission that no damages occurred exposes the persecution as regulatory harassment 3. ASSET LEGITIMACY CONFIRMED UNDER OATH Federal Court Validation: - $48.8 trillion in assets validated under federal court scrutiny - Professional auditors testified under oath to asset authenticity - SEC failed to rebut asset validation despite 2+ years to investigate - Federal court proceedings confirmed asset legitimacy beyond dispute 4. CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS Due Process and Equal Protection Denied: - Racial Discrimination: Systematic targeting of African American financial entrepreneur - Due Process Violation: Actions taken without constitutional basis or valid contract - Equal Protection Denial: Discriminatory enforcement not applied to similar entities - Regulatory Overreach: SEC exceeded constitutional authority --- COURT'S DEVASTATING REJECTION OF SEC Judge Otis D. Wright II's Initial Rejection of SEC (August 24, 2021) 1. CIVIL PENALTIES DENIED - Court rejected SEC's $963,837 penalty request as "not adequately supported" - Judge found SEC failed to justify punitive damages - SEC's penalty request exposed as baseless harassment 2. PROCEDURAL VICTORY ONLY - Default judgment based on procedure, not merit evaluation - Court never validated SEC's underlying claims - Victory based on technicality, not evidence of wrongdoing 3. NO CHALLENGE TO ASSET LEGITIMACY - Court did not dispute $48.8 trillion asset authentication - Federal proceedings validated asset legitimacy under oath - SEC's asset denial claims proven false --- SEC'S JUDGE SHOPPING AND SYSTEM MANIPULATION The Procedural Coup: How SEC Circumvented Justice When Judge Otis D. Wright II correctly denied the SEC's baseless penalty requests in August 2021, the SEC refused to accept this legitimate judicial ruling. Instead, they engaged in a systematic manipulation of the court system to manufacture a "victory" they could not win on merit. CRITICAL TIMELINE OF MANIPULATION: August 24, 2021: Judge Wright DENIES SEC penalties as "not adequately supported" October 6, 2022: SEC RENEWS same baseless penalty request (14 months later) February 23, 2023: Judge Fred W. Slaughter GRANTS identical penalties Wright had denied March 22, 2023: Final judgments imposed - $195,047 (Frank) + $968,837 (NVC Fund) The Judge Shopping Strategy The SEC's own court documents reveal the manipulation: 1. SAME BASELESS CLAIMS - Identical penalty amounts Judge Wright had rejected - No new evidence or legal basis provided - Same "not adequately supported" arguments repackaged 2. FORUM MANIPULATION - Case reassigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter - Judge with different standard willing to rubber-stamp SEC requests - Procedural manipulation to avoid Judge Wright's correct legal analysis 3. ADMISSION OF NO MERIT - SEC Attorney Sew Hoy admitted in Document 60-1: "the SEC has no claim nor allegations regarding damages" - Frank Ekejija never filed opposition because penalties had already been legally denied - No trial, no evidence presented, no merit evaluation - pure procedural manipulation The "Victory" Fraud: No Merit, Only Manipulation What the SEC Claims: "We won against Frank Ekejija and NVC Fund" The Reality: Procedural manipulation after legitimate denial by competent judge PROOF OF MANIPULATION: ✗ No trial held - case "vacated from docket without trial" ✗ No new evidence - same rejected claims recycled 14 months later ✗ No injured parties - SEC still could not identify any victims ✗ No damages proven - SEC admitted no damages existed ✗ Judge shopping - forum manipulation to avoid Wright's correct ruling --- CONSTITUTIONAL COUNTER-ATTACK SUCCESS Frank Ekejija's Expert Legal Defense 1. JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE - Successfully argued "SEC failed to name an injured party" - fundamental legal standing requirement - Exposed SEC's lack of constitutional authority over Estate Trust operations - Demonstrated SEC exceeded regulatory jurisdiction 2. ASSET AUTHENTICATION DEFENSE - $48.8 trillion certified by independent audit firms under oath during federal investigation - Professional CPA validation withstood federal court scrutiny - SEC unable to challenge asset authenticity despite 2+ years investigation 3. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY - Estate Trust operations established beyond SEC corporate jurisdiction - Sovereign authority framework confirmed through federal proceedings - Constitutional protection against regulatory harassment established 4. NO VALID CONTRACT BASIS - SEC failed to establish valid contract with NVC Fund entities - No constitutional basis for regulatory intervention demonstrated - Commercial law requirements not satisfied by SEC --- FEDERAL CRIMES COMMITTED BY SEC 18 USC 242 - Civil Rights Violations - Deprivation of Constitutional Rights: SEC violated Frank Ekejija's right to pursue commerce and happiness - Color of Law Violations: Used government authority to block legitimate business benefits and privileges - Systematic Discrimination: Targeted based on race and business success 18 USC 1001 - False Statements - Knowingly Falsified Material Facts: SEC made false claims about asset legitimacy - Fraudulent Representations: Misrepresented investigation findings to federal court - False Documents: Used fraudulent entries and misrepresentations in court filings Rule 10b-5 Securities Fraud Violations by SEC The SEC violated their own legal standards for securities fraud prosecution: SEC's Rule 10b-5 requires plaintiffs to prove: 1. Material statement or omission 2. Scienter (knowledge or intent) 3. Connection with security purchase/sale 4. Plaintiff reliance on statement 5. Plaintiff suffered economic loss 6. Loss causation SEC's Hypocrisy: The SEC prosecuted Frank Ekejija for securities fraud while failing to meet their own Rule 10b-5 standards: - No Economic Loss Proven: SEC admitted "no claim nor allegations regarding damages" - No Loss Causation: SEC could not identify any injured party after 2+ years investigation - No Actual Harm: SEC's own legal standards require proof of harm they failed to provide Legal Scholarly Authority: Georgetown Law Review confirms that securities law "ensures that those who suffer actual harm can hold the responsible party liable while protecting deceivers from having to pay what would essentially be punitive damages where no actual harm occurs." 42 USC 1983 - Civil Rights Liability - Constitutional Rights Deprivation: Subjected Frank Ekejija to systematic constitutional violations - Color of Law Violations: Misused government authority causing substantial damages - Federal Civil Rights Violations: Systematic denial of equal protection and due process Additional Federal Crimes - 28 USC 4101: Defamation, slander, and libel through false public statements - Clean Hands Doctrine Violation: SEC failed clean hands test through discriminatory enforcement - Prosecutorial Misconduct: Continued prosecution without evidence or injured parties --- DISCRIMINATORY ENFORCEMENT PATTERN Double Standard in the Law of Deception Georgetown Law Review documents the systematic "Double Standard in the Law of Deception: When Lies to the Government Are Penalized and Lies by the Government Are Protected": The Double Standard Applied to Frank Ekejija: - Citizens Penalized Without Harm: SEC prosecuted Frank without proving any injured party or damages - Government Protected Despite Harm: SEC made false statements causing massive reputational damage with no accountability - Harm Requirement Ignored: SEC violated their own Rule 10b-5 standards requiring proof of economic loss and causation SEC's "Official Oppression" Campaign Frank Ekejija's detailed analysis reveals systematic official oppression by SEC officials Manuel Vasquez and Roberto Tercero: Official Oppression Definition: "A public servant acting with intention to benefit himself or another or to harm another, knowingly commits an unauthorized act which purports to be an act of his office" SEC's Oppressive Acts: - Sabotage: "Deliberately destroy, damage, or obstruct something for political advantage" - Discrimination: "Unjust or prejudicial treatment based on race and national origin" - Prejudice: "Preconceived opinion not based on reason or actual experience" - Harassment: Endless paperwork requests and deadlines without legal basis - Intimidation: Using "fearsome" SEC reputation to coerce compliance - Monitoring: Admitted surveillance of Frank's social media activities - Market Manipulation: Prevented legitimate companies from trading through false announcements Racial Targeting Evidence - African American Entrepreneur: Systematic targeting of successful minority business leader - Unprecedented Scrutiny: Level of investigation disproportionate to similar entities - Asset Denial Campaign: Attacked $48.8 trillion in legitimate assets as "dubious" without evidence - Reputation Destruction: Coordinated campaign to destroy public reputation through false allegations - Prejudicial Enforcement: SEC formed "preconceived opinion not based on reason or actual experience" Selective Enforcement - Similar Entities Ignored: Comparable financial operations not subjected to equivalent scrutiny - Disproportionate Response: 2+ years investigation for case with zero injured parties - Regulatory Harassment: Pattern of intimidation beyond legitimate regulatory oversight - Double Standard Application: SEC demands harm-free prosecution while protecting their own harmful lies --- SEC'S OWN COMPLAINT EXPOSES THE PERSECUTION Critical Legal Distinction: Frank Was Only an Investor, Not an Operator The SEC's own filing reveals the critical distinction that demolishes their case: Frank Ekejija and NVC Fund were only investors providing assets to the three companies, not operators. Crucially, the SEC manufactured fraud allegations when no actual fraud was committed or proven by anyone. Where are the victims? Who was defrauded? After 2+ years of investigation, the SEC could not identify a single injured party because their fraud narrative was completely fabricated. The Actual Operators vs. The Investor THE REAL OPERATORS (Johnson & Everett): - Patrick Jevon Johnson: CEO and control person of all three companies (CHIT, PDXP, VICT) - Charles Everett: Chairman/Director of CHIT and Director of VICT - Johnson "orchestrated" all fraudulent Section 3(a)(10) transactions - Everett "fabricated" false debt documents and secured cooperation of fake creditors - Complete operational control over all company activities and fraudulent schemes FRANK/NVC FUND'S LIMITED INVESTOR ROLE: - Provided $700 million in assets to the three companies - Received convertible preferred stock in exchange (classic investor arrangement) - Only role was approving statements about his own assets being used - Had no operational control over the companies' fraudulent activities Direct Evidence from SEC's Own Words The SEC's complaint proves Frank was merely an investor: Lines 870-876: "This scheme involved several rounds of materially false public announcements...stating that the Issuers were acquiring $700 million in assets from NVC Fund...In exchange, the Issuers agreed to transfer shares of their preferred stock to NVC Fund." Lines 889-892: "Johnson prepared all six of the Issuers' public announcements, approved their issuance, issued the press releases, and filed CHIT's Forms 8-K. Prior to their issuance and filing, Ekejija reviewed and approved all six of the Issuers' public announcements and Forms 8-K on behalf of NVC Fund." What This Evidence Proves 1. Asset Provider Relationship: NVC Fund was providing assets TO the companies, not operating them 2. Investment Structure: Companies issued preferred stock TO NVC Fund in exchange for assets (classic investor arrangement) 3. Limited Approval Role: Frank only approved statements about his own assets - Johnson controlled all operations 4. No Operational Authority: Johnson had complete control over press releases, SEC filings, and company operations Legal Significance of This Distinction FUNDAMENTAL VIOLATION OF CORPORATE LIABILITY PRINCIPLES: Under basic corporate law, investors are not liable for operational decisions made by company management unless they exercise actual control. The SEC knowingly prosecuted an investor based on completely manufactured fraud allegations - a fundamental violation of corporate liability principles. No actual fraud was committed or proven by anyone, including Johnson and Everett. The critical question remains: Who was the claimant that was defrauded? The SEC could not identify any actual victims after 2+ years of investigation because no fraud actually occurred. The Persecution Exposed SEC's Strategic Deception: - Portrayed Frank as an operator when their own evidence shows he was only an investor - Prosecuted Frank for Johnson and Everett's fraudulent operations - Used Frank's asset legitimacy to attack him for others' management decisions - Deliberately conflated investment with operational liability to manufacture a case This Is Not Securities Law - This Is Persecution: When regulators prosecute investors for management fraud they did not commit or control, it crosses the line from regulation into systematic persecution designed to destroy legitimate business operations. --- ULTIMATE CONSTITUTIONAL VICTORY Legal Precedent Established Critical Constitutional Framework Created: 1. Asset Legitimacy Proven: $48.8 trillion assets verified under federal court scrutiny 2. Constitutional Authority: Estate Trust framework operates beyond regulatory harassment 3. No Victim Required: SEC admission of no injured party after 2+ years proves regulatory overreach 4. Regulatory Immunity: Government persecution of legitimate business operations documented and defeated SEC Settlement Trust Framework (November 21, 2022) Following constitutional victory, Frank Ekejija established the $4.888 Trillion Ekejija SEC Settlement Trust with: - Federal Judge Douglas F. McCormick as Trustee - U.S. Treasury as Depository - Constitutional authority and regulatory protection - Federal court supervision and validation --- DAMAGES CAUSED BY SEC PERSECUTION Financial Damages - Legal Costs: Millions in legal defense expenses over 5+ years of persecution - Business Disruption: Interference with legitimate banking and business relationships - Opportunity Costs: Lost business opportunities due to reputation damage - Market Impact: Disruption of financial operations and partnerships - Fraudulent Penalties: $1,163,884 in penalties imposed through judge shopping manipulation Reputational Damages - THE MOST DEVASTATING IMPACT - Public Defamation: False allegations published in federal court documents and media - "Victory" Narrative Fraud: SEC's false claim of legitimate victory when it was procedural manipulation - Media Coverage: Negative publicity based on baseless SEC allegations amplified by false "win" claims - Business Relationships: Damage to banking and institutional partnerships believing SEC "proved" wrongdoing - Personal Reputation: Systematic destruction of professional credibility and integrity through manufactured "loss" - Public Standing: Ongoing injury from SEC's false narrative that they "won" against legitimate business operations The SEC's Strategic Backfire: Validation Through Persecution The SEC's intended reputation assassination became Frank Ekejija's ultimate validation and capacity confirmation: 1. FORENSIC INVESTIGATION BECAME INADVERTENT VALIDATION - SEC's 2+ year investigation with unlimited resources validated $56.7T asset legitimacy - Federal court scrutiny provided credibility no private auditor could achieve - Prosecution attempt backfired into comprehensive legitimacy confirmation 2. CONSTITUTIONAL VICTORY THROUGH PROCEDURAL EXPOSURE - Judge Wright's proper denial exposed SEC's baseless case to federal court record - SEC's judge shopping revealed their desperation and system manipulation - Frank's constitutional approach proved correct and established legal precedent 3. STRATEGIC TRANSFORMATION: FROM ATTACK TO VALIDATION - SEC's intended destruction became comprehensive integrity verification - Business community now has federally-validated proof of NVC Fund's legitimacy - Frank Ekejija's capacity confirmed through SEC's inadvertent forensic validation process Constitutional Damages - Civil Rights Violations: Systematic denial of constitutional protections - Due Process Denial: Regulatory action without constitutional basis - Equal Protection Violation: Discriminatory enforcement not applied equally - Sovereign Authority Attack: Interference with legitimate Estate Trust operations --- CONCLUSIONS SEC's Complete Legal and Moral Failure The SEC's persecution campaign against Frank Ojogwa Ekejija and NVC Fund represents the most egregious example of regulatory system manipulation and judicial corruption in modern financial history. The SEC's actions reveal a systematic pattern of: LEGAL FAILURES: ✗ Failed to identify a single injured party ✗ Failed to prove any actual damages ✗ Failed to challenge $48.8 trillion in asset authenticity ✗ Failed to establish constitutional authority ✗ Failed to win on merit - penalties denied by competent judge SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION: ✗ Judge shopping - manipulated forum to avoid legitimate denial ✗ Procedural fraud - disguised manipulation as merit-based victory ✗ False victory narrative - weaponized fraudulent outcome for reputation destruction ✗ System manipulation - refused to accept legitimate judicial ruling ✗ Public deception - presents procedural manipulation as substantive win The Ultimate Vindication: SEC's "Victory" Exposed as Fraud The SEC's greatest strategic error was manufacturing a false "victory" that actually validates Frank Ekejija's integrity and NVC Fund's legitimate capacity. By exposing their judge shopping and procedural manipulation, the SEC inadvertently proved Frank's case and confirmed his constitutional approach. Georgetown Law Review Confirms: This represents the exact "Double Standard in the Law of Deception" where "lies to the government are penalized and lies by the government are protected" - the SEC prosecuted Frank for alleged securities fraud without meeting their own Rule 10b-5 harm requirements while protecting their own harmful false statements. The Truth: - Judge Wright correctly denied penalties as "not adequately supported" (August 2021) - SEC judge-shopped to get different outcome 14 months later (February 2023) - No new evidence, no trial, no merit evaluation - pure procedural manipulation - Final judgments are products of system gaming, not legitimate judicial process The Public Vindication: - SEC's "successful prosecution" claim exposes procedural fraud when examined - Media reports miss the real story: SEC's investigation validated Frank's legitimacy - Business community can now access federally-validated proof of NVC Fund's capacity - Frank Ekejija's integrity confirmed through SEC's inadvertent validation process Constitutional Victory Achieved Frank Ekejija's constitutional defense not only defeated the SEC's baseless persecution but established critical legal precedent: ✓ $48.8 trillion assets validated under federal court scrutiny ✓ Constitutional authority for sovereign financial operations confirmed ✓ Protection against regulatory harassment established ✓ Federal court settlement framework created ✓ Civil rights violations documented and defeated Legal Precedent for Financial Sovereignty This case establishes that: - Legitimate asset holdings cannot be attacked without evidence - Regulatory agencies must identify injured parties before prosecution - Constitutional authority protects against discriminatory enforcement - Estate Trust frameworks operate beyond SEC corporate jurisdiction - Federal courts will validate authentic financial operations --- RECOMMENDATION The SEC's wrongful persecution of Frank Ojogwa Ekejija and NVC Fund should serve as a case study in regulatory overreach, discriminatory enforcement, and constitutional violations. The complete vindication through federal court proceedings confirms that legitimate financial operations with proper constitutional authority cannot be destroyed through baseless regulatory harassment. Frank Ekejija's constitutional victory exposes the SEC's systematic corruption and establishes that procedural manipulation cannot legitimize regulatory persecution. The true victory is the documented proof that the SEC "had to win regardless of right or wrong" - revealing the agency's fundamental corruption and illegitimacy. THE ULTIMATE VINDICATION: EXPOSING THE SYSTEM Frank Ekejija's case achieved something more important than defeating the SEC's baseless charges - it exposed the entire system's corruption. The evidence now shows: 1. SEC admits no damages - their own attorneys acknowledged no harm occurred 2. Judge Wright correctly denied penalties - competent judicial analysis rejected SEC claims 3. SEC judge-shopped for different outcome - forum manipulation when legitimate denial occurred 4. No merit evaluation ever conducted - "victory" based purely on procedural gaming 5. False victory narrative weaponized - reputation destruction through manufactured loss The case proves that Frank Ekejija's constitutional approach was vindicated - his strategic patience allowed the SEC to inadvertently validate everything he claimed while exposing their own systemic corruption. The SEC's persecution backfired into comprehensive validation of Frank's integrity and NVC Fund's legitimate capacity. --- *This report documents the systematic constitutional violations, discriminatory enforcement, and ultimate legal failure of the SEC's persecution campaign against Frank Ojogwa Ekejija and NVC Fund Holding Trust, based on official court records and federal legal proceedings.*