SEC Persecution Report
Constitutional Victory Against Discriminatory Regulatory Overreach
Professional Report Download
Download the SEC Persecution Report in professional publication-ready format
🎯 THE DEVASTATING FACTS
- Dec 28, 2017: Elder Stant James legitimate business introduction
- Aug 2021: Judge Wright DENIES SEC penalties
- Feb 2023: Judge Slaughter GRANTS identical penalties
- Result: Manufactured "victory" through system manipulation
💣 SEC'S OWN COMPLAINT DESTROYS THEIR CASE
Frank Ekejija = INVESTOR ONLY
- • NVC Fund PROVIDED $700M TO companies
- • Received preferred stock (classic investor)
- • Zero operational control
Johnson & Everett = OPERATORS
- • Johnson "prepared all announcements"
- • Johnson "issued press releases"
- • Johnson "filed Forms 8-K"
🚨 CORPORATE LAW VIOLATION
SEC prosecuted the INVESTOR for the OPERATORS' fraud
⚖️ SEC VIOLATED THEIR OWN LEGAL STANDARDS
Rule 10b-5 Requires:
- Material misstatement
- Intent to deceive
- Connection to securities
- Plaintiff reliance
- ECONOMIC LOSS ← SEC ADMITS NONE
- LOSS CAUSATION ← NO VICTIMS
SEC's Official Admission:
"no claim nor allegations regarding damages"
Translation: SEC prosecuted Frank for securities fraud while failing to meet their own standards.
🎭 THE JUDGE SHOPPING SCHEME
The Timeline That Exposes Everything:
| Date | Judge | Action | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2021 | Wright | Evaluates penalties | DENIED - "not adequately supported" |
| Oct 2022 | SEC | Renews same request | 14 months later, no new evidence |
| Feb 2023 | Slaughter | Rubber stamps | GRANTED - identical penalties |
❓ WHY NO LEGAL DEFENSE?
The Question:
"If Frank had $56.7T, why no lawyers?"
The Answer:
- • Judge Wright PROVED strategy worked - denied SEC penalties
- • Constitutional case, not securities - zero victims, no damages
- • $56.7T made penalties meaningless - like fighting parking ticket
🎯 THE STRATEGIC VICTORY: SEC INADVERTENTLY VALIDATED EVERYTHING
The Profound Irony:
"Regardless of the pain caused by the SEC exercise, I am grateful for the journey because it would have been impossible to convince anyone about the size of NVC Fund Holding without the forensic investigation. The SEC knew the facts, but they just did not want the truth to be true so they strategized to bury it, and destroy me along with it."
✅ FORENSIC VALIDATION
- • SEC's 2+ year investigation confirmed asset legitimacy
- • Impossible to achieve without SEC forensic examination
- • No private auditor could provide this credibility
✅ FEDERAL COURT AUTHENTICATION
- • $48.8T validated under oath in federal proceedings
- • Professional auditors testified under penalty of perjury
- • SEC failed to rebut despite unlimited resources
✅ CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENT
- • Judge Wright's denial proves case was baseless
- • SEC judge shopping exposed - precedent set
- • Complete documentation of violations preserved
The SEC's Dilemma:
They knew the facts were true
They didn't want truth to be true
They strategized to bury it
They inadvertently validated everything
⚡ THE BOTTOM LINE
SEC'S CLAIM:
"We successfully prosecuted Frank Ekejija for securities fraud"
THE REALITY:
- ❌ Zero victims after 2+ years investigation
- ❌ SEC admits no damages occurred
- ❌ Competent judge denied penalties as baseless
- ❌ Had to judge shop to manufacture "win"
🏆 CONSTITUTIONAL VICTORY:
Complete exposure of regulatory system corruption. SEC's persecution backfired into comprehensive validation of Frank's integrity and NVC Fund's capacity.
⚖️ JUSTICE:
Constitutional record preserved that procedural manipulation cannot erase.
💀 THE MOST DAMAGING EVIDENCE
$0
Economic damages after 2+ years investigation
0
Victims identified by SEC
14
Months between Wright denial and Slaughter approval
Transparent Business Introduction:
- ✓ Dec 28, 2017: Professional introduction through Elder Stant James
- ✓ Financial audit review by Standard and Partners
- ✓ Above board for public shareholders
Constitutional Victory:
- ✓ $48.8T assets validated under federal court scrutiny
- ✓ SEC procedural manipulation exposed
- ✓ Complete persecution documentation preserved
💣 THE COERCION ATTEMPT: SEC DEMANDED SURRENDER
Frank's Own Words Expose SEC Tactics:
"The SEC practically wanted me to surrender and agree that I violated their rule 10(b)5 when they they know that I did not. Because I stood firm and rejected their cursion, the asked the Judge to fine me the maximum penalty to prevent me from violating the rule that I never violated in the first place in the future."
The SEC's Coercion Strategy:
- Demanded false confession to Rule 10b-5 violations
- Frank knew he was innocent and refused to surrender
- SEC retaliated with maximum penalties as intimidation
- Punishment for "future violations" of non-existent crimes
Frank's Principled Response (September 12, 2022):
"I reject and refuse your offer... You carried out a 30-month-long SEC forensic investigation of the NVC Fund and discovered that we were not engaged in any pump and dump scheme. You could have stopped... Nevertheless, you decided to entangle NVC Fund and me in the Federal Court..."
SEC's Judge Shopping and System Manipulation
THE PROCEDURAL COUP:
August 2021: Judge Otis Wright DENIES SEC penalties as "not adequately supported"
February 2023: Judge Fred Slaughter GRANTS identical penalties SEC couldn't win legitimately
Result: False "victory" narrative through forum manipulation, not merit
- Forum Shopping: Avoided judge who correctly denied baseless penalties
- No New Evidence: Recycled same rejected claims 14 months later
- Procedural Fraud: Manufactured "win" after legitimate denial
- False Victory Narrative: Claims merit-based win when it was system manipulation
- Reputation Weaponization: Uses fraudulent outcome to destroy public standing
- "Must Win" Strategy: Had to win regardless of right or wrong
APPEALS PROCESS MANIPULATION EVIDENCE
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ATTACK:
April 21, 2023: Ninth Circuit ordered NVC Fund to hire bar association attorney within 21 days or face dismissal
May 8, 2023: Frank filed constitutional challenge exposing bar associations as "foreign to republic form of government"
June 8, 2023: SEC moved to consolidate all four appeals to overwhelm pro se defendants
Court Orders Targeting Constitutional Authority:
- Forced Legal Representation: Despite estate trust constitutional authority
- Strategic Intimidation: Expensive legal fees to discourage appeals
- Bar Association Collusion: Foreign private organization requirement
- Constitutional Violation: Violates Foreign Agent Registration Act of 1938
Frank's Constitutional Challenge Response:
- Estate Trust Authority: NVC Fund owned by NVCFUND HOLDING TRUST
- Color of Law Violations: SEC violating 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242
- Trust Indenture Act: SEC has no permission to interfere
- Grossly Unleveled Playing Field: Using bar membership for unfair advantage
Frank's Constitutional Response (May 8, 2023):
"The SEC and its Attorneys are in clear and intentional violation of our rights under color of law, 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242 by continuing their efforts to practice unfair, biased, and prejudicial colorable law on a grossly unleveled playing field using the private BAR MEMBERSHIP to secure a unilateral, unfair, prejudiced and biased advantage in these proceedings."
The Most Devastating Damage: False Victory Narrative
What SEC Claims:
- "We successfully prosecuted Frank Ekejija"
- "Federal court validated our case"
- "We won $1.16M in penalties"
- "Court found securities violations"
The Reality:
- Judge-shopped after legitimate denial
- No trial, no evidence, no merit evaluation
- Procedural manipulation, not legitimate win
- System gaming to manufacture false victory
🏛️ SPECIAL RECOGNITION: MARK IRVINE RITCHIE - CONSTITUTIONAL ARCHITECT
Attorney General for Frank O. Ekejija Estate Trust and NVC Fund Holding Trust
Special recognition goes to Mark Irvine Ritchie, who served as the Attorney General for the Frank O. Ekejija Estate Trust and NVC Fund Holding Trust. Though not a member of the bar association, he was instrumental in the sustained constitutional defeat of the SEC.
Mark Irvine Ritchie's Strategic Constitutional Approach:
- Constitutional Authority: Represented Frank through estate trust authority
- Sacred Federal Standing: Declaration of Sacred Federal Standing established
- Strategic Victory Architect: Instrumental in Judge Wright's denial
- Constitutional Framework: Exposed SEC's procedural manipulation
- Precedent Establishment: Created constitutional precedent for challenging regulatory overreach
Constitutional Victory Validation
Mark Irvine Ritchie's work demonstrates that constitutional authority and strategic legal thinking can defeat regulatory persecution even outside traditional bar association structures. His approach was vindicated by Judge Wright's denial and the subsequent exposure of SEC judge shopping.
Court Case References
- Case No.: 2:20-cv-08985
- Court: Central District of California
- Judge: Otis D. Wright II
- Outcome: SEC penalties denied
- Settlement Trust: Federal Judge Douglas F. McCormick, Trustee
- Appeals: No. 23-55364 (Frank), No. 23-55365 (NVC Fund)
- Ninth Circuit: Constitutional challenge filed May 8, 2023
Constitutional Protections
- Article III: Standing requirements
- 5th Amendment: Due process protection
- 14th Amendment: Equal protection clause
- Civil Rights: 18 USC 242, 42 USC 1983
- Estate Trust: Sovereign authority framework
Legal Victory Contact
Chief Executive Officer
Constitutional Victory Plaintiff
ceo@nvcfund.com
Managing Attorney
Constitutional Defense Counsel
+1 (214) 335-6011
menesj@meneslawfirm.com
General Counsel
MBA, Ph.D, JD, FBIM, FCI.arb, F.N.I.Q.S, RQS
generalcounsel@nvcfund.com